Surface and Mechanical Properties of Different Dental Composites
Journal: Austin Journal of Dentistry (Vol.2, No. 2)Publication Date: 2015-02-22
Authors : Dalia A Abuelenain; Ensanya A Abou Neel; Ayman Al-Dharrab;
Page : 1-5
Keywords : Dental composites; Compressive and flexure strength; Vicker hardness; Hardness ratio and surface roughness;
Abstract
Due to the unlimited revolution in dental composites technology, a wide variety of materials are available in the market. Materials' selection is therefore a challenge and requires proper analysis of material properties. This study investigated the compressive, flexure, hardness and surface roughness of six commercially available dental composites (Filtek Z250 and 350 XT and P90, Tetric-N-Ceram and Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk Fill and IPS Impress Direct). The results showed that the highest strength and modulus (compressive and flexure) was observed for Filtek Z250 and 350XT. All tested composites showed bottom/ top hardness ratios above the minimum acceptable level (0.8) and surface roughness below the minimum acceptable level (0.2m) except Filtek P90. Accordingly, for high stress bearing applications, the materials of choice would be Filtek Z250 and Z350 XT. For low stress-bearing applications, IPS Empress and Tetric N-Ceram would be materials of choice. With P90 composites, high plaque accumulations would be expected.
Other Latest Articles
- Semilunar Coronally Advanced Flap Technique for Root Coverage in Adjacent Teeth in the Anterior Esthetic Zone ? A Case Report
- Microbial Colonization of Conventional and Enhanced Elastomeric Chains in Orthodontic Patients
- The Impact of Web 2.0 Tools on Pre-Service Teachers’ Self Confidence Levels About TPCK
- The Relationship between Spatial Skill and Spatial Anxiety: A Research on Pre-Service Primary-School Teachers
- The Classification of Development and Assessment Approaches for Mathematical Modelling Competencies
Last modified: 2017-01-20 19:09:08