ANALISA HUKUM PUTUSAN NOMOR: 28/MEREK/2011/PENGADILAN NIAGA JAKARTA SENGKETA MEREK ANTARA MEREK CALCIMAX DENGAN MEREK CALCIMEX
Journal: Perspektif (Vol.20, No. 2)Publication Date: 2015-05-27
Authors : Ali Sutiyo Syaifulloh;
Page : 118-127
Keywords : merek; itikad baik; pengusaha; trademark; good faith; businessman;
Abstract
This research was intended to review and analyze the verdicts also discusses how judges assess the fame of a trademark based on some of the lawsuit claimed by foreign entrepreneur to local entrepreneurs as a case study takes verdict No. 28/MEREK/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST. between Calcimax and Calcimex. In this dispute, the local entrepreneur, Calcimax trademark owner won because it proved no intention to pass off, imitate or trace Calcimex's notoriety for his business purposes. It also proved that Calcimax trademark registration didn't cause unfair competition, deceptive, or misleading the consumer. In other words, local entrepreneur who is Calcimax brand owner registered his brand properly and honestly.
Other Latest Articles
- PEMBATALAN SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH KARENA CACAT ADMINISTRATIF SERTA IMPLIKASINYA APABILA HAK ATAS TANAH SEDANG DIJAMINKAN
- MASYARAKAT DAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL (TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERUBAHAN-PERUBAHAN SOSIAL DALAM MASYARAKAT INTERNASIONAL)
- Time domain attribute based encryption for big data access control in cloud environment
- ARTI PENTING NILAI-NILAI DAN NORMA HUKUM DALAM BERPOLITIK PRAKTIS
- CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL RECOGNITION OVER TRADITIONAL ADAT COMMUNITY WITHIN THE MULTICULTURAL COUNTRY OF INDONESIA: IS IT A GENUINE OR PSEUDO RECOGNITION
Last modified: 2017-03-15 16:08:04