The Relevance of Liturgies in the Courts of Classical Athens
Journal: Athens Journal of History (Vol.3, No. 2)Publication Date: 2017-04-01
Authors : Vasileios Adamidis;
Page : 85-96
Keywords : ;
Abstract
What was the function of classical Athenian courts? Did they intend to enforce the rule of law? The greatest obstacle to accepting an affirmative answer is the wide use of, at first sight and from a modern (sometimes anachronistic) perspective, remotely relevant argumentation by litigants. In this paper, by reference to Greek ideas of personality, I analyse and demonstrate the legal relevance of extra-legal argumentation in classical Athenian courts, using as a case study the widely criticised invocation of liturgies (public services) by litigants. In particular, by applying a model of human action and ethical motivation which is more appropriate to the Greeks (rather that the unsuitable for the ancient context Cartesian/ Kantian), a better understanding of forensic rhetoric and argumentation is achieved. Therefore, in accordance with Greek psychology, the admittedly liberal approach to legal relevance of the Athenian courts was a calculated step towards the attainment of legal justice and the rule of law as the Athenians perceived it.
Other Latest Articles
- Gang Rape of an Adolescent in Sri Lanka: Conviction Despite an Initial Medical Opinion Excluding Rape
- Socioeconomic Demographic Study of Suicide among the People in a Southern Town Berhampur of Odisha State (India)
- Dental management of patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy - A review
- A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Forensic Identification of a Late Discovery Victim of a Motorcycle Accident
- Sertoli cell nodule of the testis: An incidental finding
Last modified: 2017-03-21 18:14:23