A comparative analysis of the treatment of patients with acute colonic obstruction obstructive tumor genesis

In a retrospective study, a comparative analysis of treatment of 509 patients with acute obstructive colonic obstruction, tumor genesis, which are made of different kinds of surgery (n=384) and stenting of the tumor stricture self-expanding metal stents (n=79). For statistical comparison of results concluded that the endoscopic stenting accompanied by fewer complications, a low mortality, reduces hospitalization time as compared to conventional operations. Stenting may be applicable for continuous decompression in patients with malignant strictures as the final treatment, as well as to the time of decompression in potentially resectable patients as the first stage of treatment («bridge to surgery»). In a retrospective study evaluated the results of clinical observation 509 patients from 2010 to October 2016 were carried out surgery for malignant obstruction of the colon. The first group included 79 patients who performed endoscopic stenting. These patients are the main group. A control group, consisting of two sub-groups, made up of 384 patients whom underwent surgery were performed. First subset patients (330 patients) performed a resection of the left colon departments to form a single-barrel colostomy (Hartmann type of operation), right-sided hemicolectomy with the formation ileotransverzoanastomosis; the second subgroup (54 patients) were formed colonies or ileostomy due to hemodynamic instability and/or the presence of unresectable tumors. We describe the results of the comparison of colorectal stenting and colostomy. The conclusion about the prospects of the use of colorectal stenting in patients with acute colonic obstruction obstructive tumor genesis.