Conventional D.C.R vs D.C.R implant method in chronic dacryocystitis

Background: Chronic dacryocystitis is the commonest cause of lacrimal passage obstruction indicates inflammation of lacrimal sac. Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the preliminary choice of surgical procedure in which lacrimal sac is connected with nasal mucosal flap by bypassing nasolacrimal duct. Objectives: This comparative study described and evaluated the effectiveness of conventional D.C.R method and D.C.R implant method in chronic dacryocystitis cases. Materials and methods: The present comparative study consisted of 200 patients with complaint of watering, pus discharge and diagnosed as chronic dacryocystitis. Out of which 160 cases were followed up for a period of 3-6 months. Study cases were operated by using “Pawar implant”. Results: Bleeding occurred during operation was much more in conventional D.C.R. (53.3%) method than D.C.R. implant method (7.7%). Complete patency of nasolacrimal duct was observed in 125 cases i.e. 76 cases in D.C.R. implant method, 35 cases in Conventional D.C.R. method and 14 cases in D.C.R implant after D.C.T done. Partial patency of naso lacrimal duct was observed in 22 cases and failure of patency was seen in 11 cases. Conclusion: D.C.R implant (Pawar Implant) method is secure, minimal time consuming, needs little incision, little bony ostium and less painful surgical modality for chronic dacryocystitis than conventional D.C.R method.