RELASI KUASA DALAM PERUBAHAN KURIKULUM 2013

The most visible and most easily explained power is in the state aspect. This is illustrated clearly from the contents of the Constitution which became the benchmark or the basis of every decision made. The polemic started from the SBY administration which created a policy on the new curriculum, which was later named the Curriculum 2013. This curriculum is intended for young generation able to meet the competition MEA. But after the government changed hands and made a new policy (policy on curriculum evaluation and finally implemented two curriculum) some writings were twisted. The implementation of government policies and criticisms that are carried out as a form of resistance are never separated from the ideologies that lie behind them. This research uses content analysis as data analysis technique. The salin to sharpen analysts also used the theory of Liberal Paradigm of Girox and the Power of Curriculum Michel W. Apple. From the research conducted found that the background of M Noah and Boediono which including the technocrats led to decisions that are very hegemonic. Meanwhile, criticism made by some parties is very nationalist or berparadigma of critical education. This is because they are back to the romanticism of making the Constitution which should be used as the basis for further policy making. In addition, the illusions of educational perfection raised by the predecessor from Indonesia (Ki Hadjar Dewantara) also did not escape as the basis.