THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SUPERSTRUCTURE MATERIALS OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED RESTORATION. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Objectives: The purpose of this review was to recognize the biological complication of implant superstructure materials in comparative to alveolar bone loss around superstructure. Methodology: A search on the electronic database and additional a manual searching was focused to detect randomized clinical trials and other studies that gives a sign about superstructure complication. alveolar bone loss was ascribed to the amount of rescission, crestal bone and loss Pocket depth. Results: The initial search gives a twenty-six from an initial search of 144 studies and the analyzing data were tabled rendering to output complication. Pocket probing depth were recognized in eighteen clinical studies, Pocket probing depth around all ceramic superstructure was 3.1 mm versus 3.5 mm for porcelain fused to metal superstructure. sixteen studies inspected the recession index for all ceramic and porcelain fused to metal superstructure. recession index ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 at porcelain fused to metal superstructure and 0 to 0.3 at all ceramic superstructure. alveolar bone loss around all ceramic superstructure was itemized to differ from 0.21 - 1.5 and 0.4 - 1.5 mm at porcelain fused to metal superstructure. Conclusion: The information described in this systematic review did not give an indication for the complication regarding all ceramic versus porcelain fused to metal superstructure. However, it can be settled that the assessment of the randomized clinical trials did not provide an absolute prime for the choice of ceramic or porcelain fused to metal as superstructure material relative to alveolar bone response.