FACTICITY, NECESSITY AND CONTIGENCY AT ARISTOTLE AND HUSSERL
Journal: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology (Vol.5, No. 1)Publication Date: 2016-06-25
Authors : Irene Breuer;
Page : 133-149
Keywords : Aristotle; Husserl; facticity; accidental; necessity; contingency; absolute; event.;
Abstract
In his book Welt und Unendlichkeit. Zum Problem phänomenologischer Metaphysik, László Tengelyi has enquired into the possibility of a phenomenological metaphysics. Among the many issues addressed in his book, he thematized a real necessity of a non-apriori kind at Aristotle and Husserl, a necessity which he called «a necessity of the fact». His research settled the basis for the present enquiry, which will examine the relationship between the absolute and the conditional necessity of a fact as well as the contingent or accidental features involved therein at Aristotle and Husserl, insofar as facticity is concerned. I intend to show that although both authors share the view that worldly beings are characterized by their contingency, they differ as to their necessity: Aristotle attributes a contingent necessity to the factual being i.e. to reality, a necessity characterized by its being temporarily conditioned by actuality and which can therefore be defined as the «conditional necessity of a fact». As to Husserl, transcendental phenomenology must, upon the basis of the eidetic method, determine the possibilities out of which the ego constitutes the factual world. He states the necessity of the fact as an eidetic necessity, which has to be grounded on eidetic laws. Later on, I'll try to show how enquiries into a «metaphysics in new sense» lead to a revision of the meaning of «fact» and to an inversion of the order of foundation as well: The original givenness of the world, the primal I, intersubjectivity and historicity as primal and absolute facts carry the eidetic necessities. Accidental causes, on the other hand, account not only for the contingency of the real but, at Husserl, for the ego's «essential openness» and its core of primal contingency. In this context, I'll argue that facticity paired with the accidental allows for the irruption of something new that overwhelms us — an event as Ereignis.
Other Latest Articles
- FROM KANT TO THE PROBLEM OF PHENOMENOLOGICAL METAPHYSICS. IN MEMORY OF LÁSZLÓ TENGELYI
- TRUTH, RESPONSIBILITY AND THE POLITICAL. JAN PATOČKA’S VIEW ON LIVING IN TRUTH
- MY EMERGENCE FROM THE IMMATURITY OF MARXISM IN VIRTUE OF PHENOMENOLOGY
- HEIDEGGER’S CRITIQUE OF HUSSERL IN HIS BLACK NOTEBOOKS
- INTRODUCTION: TRADITIONS AND PERSPECTIVES OF THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL MOVEMENT IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE
Last modified: 2018-06-22 21:54:32