USER-FRIENDLY REPORTING OF RESEARCH FINDINGS FROM A QUESTIONNAIRE
Journal: Journal of Baltic Science Education (Vol.16, No. 5)Publication Date: 2017-10-30
Authors : Andrej Šorgo;
Page : 632-633
Keywords : research instruments; research methodology; scientific publishing;
Abstract
Assume that you have implemented advice on how to make your research findings visible by choosing a catchy title and composing a striking initial sentence for your abstract, and have succeeded in attracting someone to open a web-page offering your abstract, along with the information that the price for your article is let's say, $26.95. If the abstract concludes with a statement like this: “To improve X, we make recommendations for the future use (application, etc) of X in the conclusion,” you can be sure that you will make no friends this way. There are many guidelines telling us how to write a structured abstract. Briefly, the logical order of an abstract should be as follows: Background, Purpose, Sample, Methodology, Results and Conclusions.
Other Latest Articles
- MUCH MORE THAN OLD WINE IN NEW SKINS: STUDENTS’ AND ADULTS’ KNOWLEDGE ON GRAPEVINE AND VINEYARDS AS A STARTING POINT FOR NEW TOPICS IN SCHOOL
- MODELLING THE EFFECTS OF SELECTED AFFECTIVE FACTORS ON LEARNING STRATEGIES AND CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION
- DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF AN INSTRUMENT MEASURING ANXIETY TOWARD PHYSICS LABORATORY CLASSES AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
- DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A DESIGN–BASED, CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE TEACHERS
- REVISITING STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF RESEARCH SCIENTISTS – OUTCOMES OF AN INDIRECT DRAW-A-SCIENTIST TEST (InDAST)
Last modified: 2018-07-16 00:11:27