Why the Polarizing of Addiction Professionals Regarding Abstinence versus Harm Reduction Therapy is so Absurd
Journal: Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapeutic Science (Vol.2, No. 1)Publication Date: 2016-12-26
Abstract
During the past 20 years I've been in practice, I have found that all addiction treatments are, in fact, some form of harm reduction. We've yet to find an infallible treatment for addictions and substance use disorders. However, the change in the DSM terminology is very significant. It differentiates diagnoses of substance abuse and chemical dependency from its evolved diagnosis of substance use disorder - mild, moderate or severe. Those with severe diagnoses (co-morbidity involving diabetes, liver damage, severe psychiatric conditions, dementia, legal, etc) would certainly be appropriate candidates for abstinence over moderation. But as I see it, at the end of the day, from moderation to abstinence it's all harm reduction.
Other Latest Articles
- Fast Treatment of Methamphetamine Related Anxiety and Depressive Disorders: A Novel Approach
- Tramadol Dependency Treatment: A New Approach
- The Effects of Substance Abuse Following Personal Injury: Five Case Studies from a Medico-Legal Context
- Buprenorphine Maintenance for Opioid Dependence in Public Sector Healthcare: Benefits and Barriers
- Update on Opioid Addiction for Perioperative and Critical Unit Care: Anaesthesiologists Perspective
Last modified: 2018-09-06 14:07:26