On the Cause of the Asymmetric Distribution between Scrambling and Postposing in Japanese
Journal: Language Art (Vol.3, No. 2)Publication Date: 2018.05.28
Authors : Satoshi Imamura;
Page : 77-96
Keywords : Scrambling; Postposing; Discourse Analysis; Japanese; Givōnian approach.;
Abstract
Japanese exhibits a large degree of flexibility in terms of word order. Thus, not only SOV but also OSV (scrambling) and SVO (postposing) are grammatical. In terms of discourse function, there are some similarities between scrambling and (non-pause type) postposing. According to Author (2017) and Shimojo (2005), scrambled objects and postposed elements are anaphorically salient but cataphorically non-salient. Yet, Shimojo (2005: 202) observed no example with a postposed object. In order to explain this tendency, I propose that scrambling is not as costly as postposing due to the following two reasons. First, scrambling follows given-new-ordering whereas postposing does not. Second, rightward movements are more costly than leftward movements in Japanese (Fukui: 1993). Therefore, postposing is expected to be selected when scrambling cannot be chosen. As scrambling can be used for the object but not for the subject in SOV, postposing is dominantly utilized for subjects.
Other Latest Articles
- The Amount of Job Satisfaction among EFL Teachers in Iran A Comparison of Gender Groups, Academic Degree, and Major
- Conceptual Metaphors of FEAR in Persian and English: A Cognitive and Corpus-based Approach
- The Role of Positive and Negative Aspects of E-Technology on Learning and Teaching English in the Industrial Society of Iran
- Language of Love in the Persian Literature
- Effectiveness of acupuncture and moxibustion in osteoarthritis knee
Last modified: 2018-10-18 05:07:22