A CRITICAL RESPONSE TO DINOO KELLEGHAN?S LANKAN ENGLISH: HOW FAR DO WE GO?
Journal: International Journal of Advanced Research (Vol.6, No. 9)Publication Date: 2018-09-08
Authors : NimashaMalalasekera.;
Page : 786-789
Keywords : SLE linguistic schizoglossia linguistic schizophrenia exonormative variety endonormative variety;
Abstract
This paper is a critical response to Dinoo Kelleghan's article Lankan English: How Far Do We Go? Kelleghan (2013) expresses her views on a seminar titled Kaduva: the Colomboscope seminar on Sri Lankan English Learning conducted by the Kaduva panel: Dr. Sumathy Sivamohan of the University of Peradeniya, Dr. Shermal Wijewardene of the University of Colombo, writer and editor Malinda Seneviratne and moderator Shyamalee Tudawe. In the light of “linguistic schizoglossia” (Kandiah, 1981) and “linguistic schizophrenia” (Kachru, 1992), the paper discusses how Kelleghan's arguments reflect the attempt of Sri Lankan users of English to conform to an ‘ideal' exonormative variety of English resisting Sri Lankan English (SLE). Focusing on English language teaching and learning, it also problematizes her suggestion to form a “cultural lingua franca.”
Other Latest Articles
- URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION MEASURES IN KODAIKANAL REGION TAMIL NADU
- TO COMPARE THE LEVELS OF REPRODUCTIVE HORMONES AND TSH IN FEMALES WITH PRIMARY INFERTILITY AND EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS
- 3D GEOLOGICAL MODELING OF THE UNDERGROUND USING GDM MULTILAYERS 2014 SOFTWAREAPPLICATION TO THE CITY OF CASABLANCA IN MOROCCO
- NON-JUDICIAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN CRIMINAL CASE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PENAL POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
- BIODIVERSITY STUDY OF LAKE SHORELINES OF BENGALURU PERI URBAN AREA AND ITS MANAGEMENT
Last modified: 2018-10-19 17:26:55