RECONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORITIES OF THE PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVES SELECTION OF CHIEF OF CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION ELECTION BASED ON PROGRESSIVE LAW

One form of the DPR's oversight function is to have the authority to select public officials at an independent state commission, including the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The purpose of this study is first, to examine the authority of the DPR in selecting KPK leaders. Second, analyzing the impact of the DPR's authority to select KPK leaders. Third, the ideal reconstruction ME DPR authority in the selection of the KPK leadership election based Progressive Law. The type of research used in this study is empirical legal research and the data sources used include primary data and secondary data. The nature of this research is descriptive and prescriptive. The results of the study found that the implementation of the DPR's authority brought potential positive and negative impacts. The negative impact of the DPR's authority has the potential to influence the independence of the KPK, encouraging the emergence of deals, agreements and commitment s which has the potential to weaken the eradication of corruption, and because the DPR is a political institution, political considerations are an important factor compared to integrity and competence in determining the choice of who will be elected as KPK Leader. For this reason, it is necessary to reconstruct the Law on the Corruption Eradication Commission, which contains the authority of the DPR to carry out the election selection. The KPK leadership is channeled through the involvement of the DPR elements in the selection committee of the KPK Leaders who are independent and formed by the Government.