Utang dan Pengakhiran Perjanjian Secarap Sepihak (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Konsultan PT. Garuda dan PT. Magnus

This article aims to analyze the existence of the debt in the reciprocal agreement between PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus, and about the termination of the agreement which set aside article 1266 Civil Law unilaterally whether could cancel debt payment obligation or not. This research is normative research which observes the data that correlated to the agreement, debt, act against the law, and termination of an agreement which set aside the article 1266 Civil Law. The approach of this article is a statute approach which reviews the data that have a correlation with the law of agreement and termination of the agreement, and case approach. It is the case of PT. Garuda and PT. Magnus. The data collection was done by library research that observing the data about the law of agreement and termination of the agreement. The result of the research shows that there must be approval from each party in a reciprocal agreement. Thus, the debt of PT. Garuda to PT. Magnus is the obligation that must be fulfilled due to PT. Magnus has worked maximally to complete its obligation. In another side, the termination of law which set aside article 1266 Civil Law is acting against the law, therefore the obligation to pay the debt must be done, in the reason of there is indemnification in an act against the law.