Liver biopsy evaluation in chronic hepatitis b infection: ‘Back to basics’ - re-visiting semi-quantitative scoring systems

Context: Despite advances in understanding into the pathophysiology of chronic hepatitis B, liver biopsy evaluation on H&E stained sections has stood the test of time. There is therefore, a need to re-visit the most commonly used scoring systems with an aim to look for an ideal semi-quantitative system which is objective, simple to apply and versatile enough to incorporate newer advances. Aims: To compare various semi-quantitative scoring systems with a view to (a) look for consistency in reporting, (b) assess usefulness in follow-up and (c) recommend a scoring system that is practical and easy to apply. Settings and Design: Chronic hepatitis B was defined as HBsAg positive status for at least six months. All liver biopsies were evaluated using semi-quantitative scoring systems viz the Knodell, Ishak's modified HAI and Scheuer systems. Materials and Methods: Baseline biopsies were assessed for intra- and inter-observer variation in order to find the system best suited for routine use. The observer variation was also calculated separately for portal, peri-portal and lobular inflammation as well as for fibrosis. Statistical Analysis used: A Kappa analysis up to 95% confidence interval was done to look for statistical significance of inter- and intra-observer agreement between the three scoring systems. Results: On multivariate Kappa analysis, it was found that both inter- and intra-observer agreement were comparable in the Knodell and Ishak systems, and was significantly better with the Scheuer system. Further, agreement was better with fibrosis than with necro-inflammatory scores. Conclusions: The authors recommend Ishak's modified system as it conveyed the most relevant and exhaustive information.