Stricter welfare rules are not the solution to poverty
Journal: Environment and Social Psychology (Vol.3, No. 1)Publication Date: 2018-06-30
Authors : Leah Hamilton;
Page : 1-2
Keywords : Poverty; Welfare; Financial Incentives;
Abstract
Over the past three decades, American welfare policy has moved towards ever more restrictive eligibility criteria, reflecting a growing belief that generous benefits encourage dependence. In this essay, I argue that harsher
welfare rules actually make it more difficult for low income families to support their children, transition to work and maintain long term financial independence. In some cases such as drug testing, these rules represent an unconstitional intrusion into the lives of citizens and are ultimately a waste of government resources. Moving towards a model of support rather than punishment for families in need would be an ultimately more effective method of poverty alleviation.
Other Latest Articles
- Mental health and the role of culture and resilience in refugees fleeing violence
- Group processes, intergroup relations and human resource practices in mergers and acquisitions post-combination: A critical review and research agenda for the future
- Conscious evolution, social development and environmental justice
- „White trash‟ in the „basket of deplorables‟: Continued crisis of men in America
- Needs assessment for developing a multidisciplinary model for trafficking prevention and rehabilitation of survivors
Last modified: 2020-03-12 14:18:31