REPLY TO ADONIS FRANGESKOU’S RESPONSE
Journal: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology (Vol.9, No. 1)Publication Date: 2020-06-15
Authors : ANNA YAMPOLSKAYA;
Page : 366-372
Keywords : Levinas; Kant; God; sensibility; sublime; subjectivity;
Abstract
This is my short reply to Adonis Frangeskou's response to my review of his book (2017). I offer a careful reading of the passage from Levinas quoted in Frangeskou's response. I discuss the idea of God-in-me in connection with the issues of sensibility, vulnerability, and suffering. I argue that interpreting Levinas within the framework of the analytics of the sublime is crucially important for the catastrophic dimension of Levinas' approach to subjectivity.
Other Latest Articles
- RESPONSE TO ANNA YAMPOLSKAYA’S REVIEW OF LEVINAS, KANT AND THE PROBLEMATIC OF TEMPORALITY
- BEING-THERE AND BEING-TRUE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE
- Application of ranked-set sampling in estimation of average yield of cotton crop
- THE PREFACE TO THE TRANSLATION OF A TYPESCRIPT OF MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S TALK “BEING-THERE AND BEING-TRUE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE”
- Socio-economic profile and purchase behaviour of elite consumers towards the coconut soft drink Neera
Last modified: 2020-07-29 16:26:38