Gustav Ewers’ contribution to the study of the initial period of Ancient Rus’ history
Journal: RUDN Journal of Russian History (Vol.17, No. 1)Publication Date: 2018-05-18
Authors : Vyacheslav Fomin; Lubov Isakova;
Page : 151-174
Keywords : Gustav Ewers; normanism; antinormanism; patrimonial theory; Khazar theory; Pontic Rus;
Abstract
The authors analyze the views of G. Ewers (1871-1830) on the history and the law of Ancient Rus’. Ewers’ main achievement is the criticism of the Norman theory. The article includes the characteristics of the following arguments: the inconsistency of the Swedish etymology of the word «Rus’»; the fallacy of the origination of the ancient Russian law out of the Scandinavian law. The basis of Ewers’ concept is the patrimonial theory. It reveals the natural course of the emergence of a state of Eastern Slavs. The scientist formulated the Khazar theory instead of the Norman theory. Ewers attributed the origin of Rus’ to the Northern Black Sea region. He believed that a large role in the formation of the Pontic Rus’ was played by the Khazar ethnos. Ewers also made a significant contribution to the study of the Russian Chronicles. He denounced Schloezer’s methodology, demonstrated the composite character of the Russian Chronicles. The authors show that Ewers’ ideas were highly appreciated by his contemporaries. Ewers’ criticism meant the end of the first wave of normanism. His insights remain important for the contemporary historiography against the background of the attempts of the resurgence of normanism.
Other Latest Articles
- Russians in Udmurtia in the second half of the 20th century: demographic aspect
- Geography of “Archival continents” of Russian Diaspora: history of formation
- Russian community in Spain and cultural dialogue (1991-2015)
- Administrative apparatus of Stalin era and Alekhin - Botvinnik failed match (1939-1940)
- History of Russian emigrants in Poland in 1919-1939: new sources and modern historiography
Last modified: 2020-08-04 06:40:27