TRANS-MOBILITIES IN POST-HUMAN ERA: HOW IS SOCIAL ORDER STILL POSSIBLE?
Journal: RUDN Journal of Sociology (Vol.18, No. 4)Publication Date: 2018-11-18
Authors : I Katernyi;
Page : 638-650
Keywords : ascriptive statuses; morphogenesis; mobility; transsexual; cloning; android; recognition;
Abstract
The today’s post-human era is characterized by transformation, mutation, and reinvention of social identities of agents. Transgenders, robots, сlones have been increasingly involved in social community and, thus, contributed to profound normative morphogenesis in the contemporary society. Consequently, there is a challenging primordial heteronormativity with some fundamental ascriptive binaries evident in transgressive confusion of the following oppositions: between human and subhuman (e.g. legitimation of animal or fetal rights); between cultural and natural (cyborgs); between animate and inanimate (android robots); between corporeal and incorporeal (virtual, ‘augmented’ and ‘mixed’ reality). A range of practices related to such transgression can be considered as trans-mobility that implies various selfdetermined individual transitions from the former ascribed position to a new transitive one and external transpositions due to forced alteration of individual or collective statuses/identities. The article considers three typical modes of morphological trans-mobility to identify the most important arrays the ontological binaries are de-ascribed in: visceral trans-mobility pertaining to all possible options to modify human corporality (including radical body modification); conversional trans-mobility beyond the line between life and death, being and nonbeing, corporeal (material) and incorporeal (immaterial) ontology (from bitcoins to clones); prosopopoeian trans-mobility involving initially non-social creatures into active social life (from pets to robots). The author seeks to answer the question of how current normative morphogenesis is embedded into social-normative order. Based on the theory of recognition, the article considers morphotaxis (an opposite of morphogenesis) as a latent compensatory mechanism to maintain the primordial social order by persistent reproduction of heteronormativity. Based on some empirical data, the author shows that dichotomized sexual (male-female), genetical (sexual-asexual) and biological (animate-inanimate) patterns with corresponding social norms still constitute the morphological foundation of the primordial social order despite the advanced post-human practices.
Other Latest Articles
- DEVELOPING AN APPROACH TO MULTIMODAL QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INTERVIEWERS’ COGNITIVE LOAD: FIRST RESULTS OF A FIELD QUASI EXPERIMENT
- THEORETICAL POTENTIAL AND ROLE OF I.A. ILYIN’S STATE-LEGAL VIEWS IN THE RUSSIAN HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY
- CLAUDE LÉVI-STRAUSS ON THE PROBLEM OF “SYNCHRONIC” TIME
- VIOLENCE AND JUSTICE: ITALIAN INTERNMENT IN THE WARTIME UNITED STATES Review of the book: Chopas M.E.B. Searching for Subversives. The Story of Italian Internment in Wartime America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 2017. 232 p
- “MELANCHOLY AS HAPPINESS OF BEING IN SORROW”, AND OTHER HISTORICALLY VARIABLE ‘DRESSES’ OF SOCIAL EMOTIONS Review of the book: Johannisson K. Istorija melankholii. O strahe, skuke i chuvstvitelnosti v prezhnie vremena i teper [History of Melancholy. On Fe
Last modified: 2020-08-04 07:13:47