POST-SOVIET STATES: CHALLENGES OF DEVELOPMENT
Journal: Vestnik RUDN. International Relations (Vol.18, No. 2)Publication Date: 2018-07-17
Authors : Alexander Krylov;
Page : 247-258
Keywords : post-Soviet states; post-Soviet elites; oligarchic regimes; bureaucratic vertical of authority; the transnational oligarchy; modernization; sovereignty; national interests; globalization;
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the most significant processes and trends within the former USSR area associated, primarily, with domestic economic and political problems, the results of 25 years of independent development of former Soviet republics, specifics of their political and social and economic transformation. These and other topics are considered in the context of Russia’s interests and the role of Russia on the post-Soviet territory.The author’s opinion is that a typical feature of oligarchic regimes in the post-Soviet states has become a refusal to have an independent policy and a course aimed at the introduction of an external control. In this case, the sovereignty and national interests of a country are sacrificed for the interests of the transnational oligarchy. Local politicians and oligarchs act as its agents. Naturally the externally controlled countries (Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine) have found themselves far behind the other post-Soviet states.According to the author, the most successful of the post-Soviet states have become the states with a well-developed and rigid administrative and bureaucratic vertical of authority, which was able to limit the role of the oligarchy and local criminal structures in politics. Acting in this way, the nation-oriented part of the government and business have managed to prevent the dictatorship of the transnational oligarchy, overcome the negative implications of transformational crisis and ensure internal political, social and economic strength within new state boundaries. This creates opportunities for accelerated modernization and construction of a more democratic state system.
Other Latest Articles
- Review of the book: The Politics and Complexities of Crisis Management in Ukraine: A Historical Perspective / Ed. by G. Simons, M. Kapitonenko, V. Lavrenyuk, V. Vlaeminck. London: Routledge, 2018. - 252 p
- Review of the book: Hannah M. The Best “Worst President”: What the Right Gets Wrong About Barack Obama. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2016. - 324 p
- RUDN University and Latin-Caribbean America: new directions of interaction in the educational sphere
- The role of humanitarian cooperation in contemporary foreign policy of Spain
- Psychological perception of great powers’ performance in the Globe. The origins of Russophobia. Interview with Andrey Pavlovich Tsygankov, Professor, Chair of International Relations and Political Science, San Francisco State University, PhD
Last modified: 2020-08-14 08:31:05