A Preliminary Comparative Analysis of MBR and CAS Wastewater Treatment Systems
Journal: International Journal of Water and Wastewater Treatment (Vol.3, No. 2)Publication Date: 2017-04-05
Authors : Karim MA James L Mark;
Page : 1-6
Keywords : Wastewater; MBR and CAS systems; Economic comparison; Long-term operation;
Abstract
A preliminary analytical study was conducted to compare the cost effectiveness and performance of a membrane bio-reactor (MBR) versus conventional activated sludge (CAS) systems for the treating of wastewater. The design and construction cost, Operation and Maintenance (O&M) cost, and foot-print of different MBR and CAS wastewater treatment plants were collected from various states. The performance data for several parameters were collected from local MBR and CAS wastewater treatment plants. It was found from this study that based on the capital cost considerations; CAS system appears to be a better option compared to the MBR system. However, for long-term operation, foot-print requirements, and treatment effectiveness to meet more stringent effluent characteristics, the MBR system appears to be a better option over the CAS system. Based on the long-term normalized cumulative cost analysis, the MBR system is a better option for a plant operating longer than 67 years, whereas the CAS system is a better option for a plant operating less than 67 years. Therefore, for a long-term operational goal and for performance considerations, the MBR system seems to be the best option.
Other Latest Articles
- Removal of Fluoride Ion by Silicon Nitride Powder
- Survey of Damai Landfill site in Vietnam and Proposal for Improving Decrease of Organic Compounds
- Holistic Wastewater Reuse Solutions – Evaluation of Treatment Efficiency, Environmental Impacts and Costs
- Lead Removal from Mine Tailings with Multiple Metallic Ions
- Settling and Dewatering Characteristics of an A-stage Activated Sludge Process Proceeded by Shortcut Biological Nitrogen Removal
Last modified: 2020-08-29 22:56:22