Continuous Glucose Monitors are Cost Neutral Compared to SMBG
Journal: Journal of Diabetes Research and Therapy (Vol.6, No. 2)Publication Date: 2020-12-05
Authors : Tom Elliott Arthur Weissinger;
Page : 1-4
Keywords : Continuous glucose monitor; Flash glucose monitor; Self monitoring of blood glucose; Hypoglycemia; Hyperglycemia; Diabetic ketoacidosis; Hypo; Type 1 diabetes; Economic benefit; Cost offsets; Quality of life;
Abstract
Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGM) has revolutionized the management of diabetes and has become the standard of care for the management of Type 1 diabetes. The primary factor preventing widespread uptake of CGM is cost. Currently there is little provincial coverage for CGM, and many patients still must pay for the technology. The cost of CGM is here evaluated in comparison to standard care (self monitoring of blood glucose), including analysis of cost-savings and improvements in quality of life that could be achieved with the use of CGM. When costs of comorbidities and absenteeism that could be reduced by the use of CGM are included in the analysis, it is determined that CGM is cost-neutral relative to standard care.
Other Latest Articles
- The Evaluation of Gene Oct4 Expression as a New Tumor Marker in Pancreatic Tumor and Non-Tumor Cell Lines
- Glycemic Control, Medication Use and Obesity among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Presenting to an Endocrinology Clinic during the War in Yemen. A Three-Year Retrospective Study
- Oesophagealpapillomatosis in a Patient with History of Genital Warts
- Treatment-Resistant Bronchopneumonia as a Form of Presentation of Lung Cancer: A Case Report
- Hormonal Regulation of Normal Voice Production in Adolescence, a Review
Last modified: 2021-02-25 16:11:04