Fertility Preservation Discussion in Adult Male Cancer Patients Is Underutilized and Varies Based on Age
Journal: Journal of Fertility Preservation (Vol.1, No. 1)Publication Date: 2020-12-31
Authors : Peter N. Dietrich Johnathan Doolittle Pranav Dadhich Daniel Roadman Ross G. Everett Jagan Kansal G. Luke Machen Jon S. Ellison; Jay I. Sandlow;
Page : 1-6
Keywords : oncofertility; cryopreservation; fertility preservation;
Abstract
Introduction. Oncofertility is often omitted in pretreatment discussion and planning. This study seeks to evaluate the prevalence and influencing factors of cryopreservation discussions. Methods. A retrospective review was performed on 3,133 male patients aged 18–60 years with a cancer diagnosis at a single institution. Data was collected for cryopreservation discussion and if cryopreservation of sperm was performed. Age, race, cancer location, primary treatment, and chemotherapy status were also recorded. Results. A total of 2,504 patients were included for analysis. There was documentation of counseling in 14.1% and 5.0% underwent cryopreservation. Logistic regression indicated a significant effect of age, race, site of cancer, primary treatment, and chemotherapy treatment on whether cryopreservation was discussed (χ2
Other Latest Articles
- Welcome to a New Journal—Journal of Fertility Preservation
- Mechanobiology Journal—Welcome Editorial
- A Short-Period Therapy with Subcutaneous Low-Dose IL-2 Plus High-Dose Melatonin to Correct Advanced Cancer-Related Lymphocytopenia: Possible Impact on the Survival Time
- Psychoneuroimmunology Journal—Welcome to a New Journal
- Structure, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Magnetite Nanoparticles Doped with Zinc and Lanthanum and Prepared in Oxygen and Nitrogen Atmosphere
Last modified: 2021-03-15 17:16:31