Structural and Communicative Features of Coordinating Structures as a Language Universal

The article presents analysis of formally-grammatical and semantic nature of syntactic units, semantic and structural organization of text as single unit of higher order that is one of pressing questions of modern linguistic science. In particular, syntactic and semantic connection and facilities of its expression are studied on interphrase and interindention level. The article contains an attempts to identify common to Ukrainian and Russian linguistics approaches to studying the phenomenon of coordinating. The article deals with the interpretation of coordinating as one of the types of syntactic connection and its differentiation with parceling.Elements that the article contains complement and develop opinion expressed earlier, lights up it from a new side and has for an object to spread some details, explanations. The most expressive and identical for the East Slavonic languages features of constructions with this type of connection are analyzed. Among the signs of coordinating, the elements to be joined are singled out in the form of the final components of a dialogical unity, repetitions of lexical and syntactical com- ponents of the statement, and remote location. The specificity of one of the structural types of constructions with coordinating that has its own formal coordinating indicators, is investigated. The analysis of qualitative composition of means of grammatical expression of this connection is made.An attempt to solve the problem of the joining not on the basis of separate theoretical positions that answer the features of concrete language, comes true, on the supervisions got as a result of research of the problem on material of different languages. Research of joining constructions in a comparatively-language plan is positioned in-process as fruitful and perspective, as these constructions in an interlingual aspect have a row of general signs foremost structural. Interlingual similarity of these constructions that is traced in different aspects obviously, is non-random and can be examined as proof of general tendency in development of syntactic subsystems of different family languages, that can be defined as a tendency to democratization of language.