Comparative between Behaviour of Single Floating Reinforced Stone Column and Single Pile under Axial Load
Journal: International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (Vol.7, No. 1)Publication Date: 2018-01-05
Authors : Haifaa A. Ali; Mohammed S. Jabbar;
Page : 862-866
Keywords : Finite element; floating reinforced stone column; axial load; bored pile; driven pile; improvement;
Abstract
In this work, three-dimensional finite, element, analysis of single, floating reinforced, stone, column, (FRSC) and, pile foundation under axial load analyzed using PLAXIS (3D) 2013. The hardening soil and Mohr-Coulomb models are used to simulate the behaviour of clayey soil and FRSC respectively. While linear elastic model is used to simulate the behaviour of structures (pile, footing and geo-grid). Two types of pile foundation are studied, bored and driven concrete pile, the parametric study including the changing of length and diameter of (FRSC) and bored pile, however, the driven pile has constant cross section (28 x 28) mm. For FRSC and bored pile two lengths (6 and 12) m and three diameters (0.4, 0.6 and 0.8) m are analyzed. From the results of finite element analysis, the bored pile has clear advantage of improvement over the driven pile and FRSC, the results of the improvement using the FRSC were better than the driven pile.
Other Latest Articles
- Sudden Onset Severe Headache in a Patient of Aplastic Anaemia Following Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Case Report
- The Perception of People with HIV/AIDS against the Support of the Family in the City of Ternate 2017
- Calculate the Physical Properties for Samples of Active Galaxies Using Optical Spectroscopy Technique
- Relationship of the Level of Education, Knowledge and Attitude of the Mother against the Efforts of Disease Prevention Acute Respiratory Tract Infectious Diseases
- Multi-Focus Image Fusion Using Discrete Cosine Harmonic Wavelet Transform
Last modified: 2021-06-28 18:35:45