Trajectories of Education Development: from 1960s to 2000s
Journal: RUDN Journal of Philosophy (Vol.25, No. 4)Publication Date: 2021-12-16
Authors : Svetlana Tokareva;
Page : 656-667
Keywords : integration of education; reform of Russian education; autonomy of the subject; technologization of educational activities; critical thinking; project thinking;
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the formal and substantive aspects of the development of education in the process of forming a single European educational space. The formal conditions for the integration of education (the development of common quality criteria, the choice of educational trajectories, the mobility of students and teachers) were considered by default as arising from the European concept of individual rights and freedoms. The content of education in the post-industrial era, when society refuses to impose strict value and behavioral imperatives on the individual, is aimed at ensuring a level of autonomy of the subject that would allow him not only to realize his creative potential, but also to determine his life goals and meanings. In this regard, an important task is to develop the theoretical and conceptual foundations of the leading trends in the transformation of the educational system - personalization, autonomization of the subject, the introduction of projective techniques, recognition of the leading role of creative activity. The conditions for Russia's entry into the Bologna process and the thesis about the alienness of the standards introduced in this regard for national education are analyzed. It is shown that the cognitive foundations of design and creative activity, as well as the ideas of intellectualization of education, developed in the 1960s in Russian philosophy, psychology and pedagogy, can be used as methodological foundations for reforming Russian education. The possibilities of using the activity paradigm as a conceptual framework for developing a teaching methodology, a methodology for the formation of critical thinking and project activity are shown. This allows us to conclude that there is still variability in the trajectories of the development of domestic education, which can be based both on methodological and technological advances, as well as cultural and anthropological perspectives.
Other Latest Articles
- Spiritual Exercise as Techne: Philosophy as a Way of Liberating Education
- The Problem of Matter of Education in the Digital Age
- Interrogating Values of Adult Education Practice in Hong Kong
- Education and Corporeality: Contributions from the Philosophy of Sport
- Plutocracy, Platonism and Education in Brazil: Some Reflections on the COVID-19 Pandemic
Last modified: 2021-12-16 08:53:59