EFFECTIVENESS OF DIADYNAMIC CURRENT AND MENS IN HEEL PAIN: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Journal: International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research (IJPR) (Vol.3, No. 2)Publication Date: 2015-04-11
Authors : Anand B. Heggannavar; Preeti R. Ramannavar; Satyam S. Bhodaji .;
Page : 992-998
Keywords : Diadynamic current; Microcurrent Electrical Neuromuscular Stimulator or MENS; Pain Disability Index and Foot Disability Index.;
Abstract
Relevance: Heel pain is one of the most common conditions leading to functional disabilities seen worldwide. There are different methods to manage heel pain, conservatively, and/or surgically. Physiotherapy treatment, as a part of conservative management, involves reduction of pain and improvement of functional ability by various approaches like exercise therapy, electrotherapy and manual therapy techniques. Various studies have shown that Diadynamic current and MENS along with conventional treatments give significant beneficial effects in pain reliving. Hence the present study was undertaken to compare and see the effect of Diadynamic current and MENS in heel pain. Participants: 30 subjects (mean age 25.73 ± 6.56) diagnosed with heel pain were recruited from Out-Patient Department of Physiotherapy of KLES Dr. Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belagavi. Method: Subjects were randomly allocated into 2 groups namely Group A (n=15) who received Diadynamic current along with conventional treatment as Therapeutic ultrasound and strengthening and stretching exercises and Group B (n=15) who received MENS with conventional treatment same as in group A for 7 days. The outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Pain disability index (PDI) and foot disability index (FDI) for functional disability. Analysis: Within group and between group analyses after intervention was done to assess changes using paired t-test and unpaired t - test. Result: Mean difference of VAS scores for Group A was 6.9 ± 1.48 and for Group B was 4.3 ± 2.43. Mean difference of PDI scores for Group A was 274 ± 117 and for Group B was 171 ± 99.Mean difference of FDI scores for Group A was 0.36 ± 0.24 and for Group B was 0.15 ± 0.15. Intra group comparison was statistically significant with p= <0.001 for both the groups in terms of VAS, PDI and FDI respectively. Inter group comparison was statistically significant with p= 0.005, 0.031, 0.007 for VAS, PDI and FDI respectively. Conclusion: Diadynamic current is effective in reducing pain and secondarily improving the functional ability in subjects with heel pain.
Other Latest Articles
- A STUDY TO EVALUATE RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS AND LUNG FUNCTION IMPAIRMENT IN BEEDI WORKERS AND USEFULLNESS OF PROTECTIVE MASK IN REDUCING RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS
- UTILIZATION OF PULSED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND TRADITIONAL PHYSIOTHERAPY IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT
- RISK ASSESSMENT OF DECUBITUS ULCERS USING FOUR SCALES AMONG PATIENTS ADMITTED IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN A TERTIARY CARE SET UP: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
- THE INFLUENCE OF CEREBRAL INFARCT LOCATION AND VOLUME ON MOTOR AND FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER STROKE: A NARRATIVE REVIEW
- COMPARATIVE STUDY ON EFFECT OF SLOW AND FAST PHASED PRANAYAMA ON QUALITY OF LIFE AND PAIN IN PHYSIOTHERAPY GIRLS WITH PRIMARY DYSMENORRHOEA: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Last modified: 2015-04-11 21:40:01