METHODS OF OVERCOMING THE DEFICIENCIES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE STATUS AND ORGANIZATION OF WORK OF STATE AUTHORITIES AND LOCAL SELFGOVERNMENT BODIES IN THE CONTEXT OF MILITARY AND POSTWAR RECONSTRUCTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE

This scientific article is devoted to the shortcomings of the legal regulation of the status and organization of the work of public authorities and local governments in the context of military and postwar reconstruction of infrastructure. The urgency of this problem is that the current legal framework of Ukraine, which regulates the military and postwar reconstruction of the state, contains a large number of inaccuracies and needs to be comprehensively updated. The few Ukrainian scientific works that were designed to at least partially address the issue of infrastructure reconstruction within the state do not cover most of the aspects that arise in the process of this reconstruction. The proposed article aims to offer their own ideas for improving the regulatory framework of Ukraine, which should regulate the process of restoring damaged and destroyed state infrastructure. To this end, the article examines the legal framework governing the status and organization of public authorities and local governments. Further in the scientific work it is noted that the renewal of the current legal framework for the reconstruction of infrastructure should take place exclusively in accordance with the plans for the integration of the national legal framework into the European legal space. Taking into account all these factors, the authors of the article summarized that the only comprehensive way to regulate the process of reconstruction of Ukraine is to create a Plan for reconstruction of damaged infrastructure during martial law and in the reconstruction period and its subsequent legal consolidation. This plan should include changes at the state level (Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, committees in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine), changes at the local level (military and military-civil administrations, local and regional councils, status of (united) territorial communities), as well as certain additional changes (creation of certain commissions and subdivisions). A separate list of the most important provisions that must be set out in the reconstruction plan was presented separately.