Evaluation of PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380A) insertion in a teaching hospital of Western U. P.
Journal: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology (Vol.2, No. 2)Publication Date: 2013-06-01
Authors : Abhilasha Gupta Aruna Verma Jyoti Chauhan;
Page : 204-208
Keywords : PPIUCD; Interval IUCD; Acceptance; Safety;
Abstract
Background: Comparative evaluation of PPIUCD and interval IUCD in terms of incidence of failure, expulsions, bleeding P/V and other complications. Methods: Total 300 willing women after counselling in antenatal, early labor or postnatal period were inserted PPIUCD after excluding chorioamnionitis, PROM >18hrs, Unresolved PPH, Puerperal sepsis. Another 150 willing women were inserted interval IUCD after excluding contraindications. All were followed up for 6 months. Results: Expulsion rate was significantly higher in PPIUCD as compared to interval insertions (4.3% v/s 2.0%; p value< 0.05). Number of removal of IUCD was almost similar in both groups(5.6% v/s 6.0%) but bleeding as a cause of removal was significantly more in interval group(23.5% v/s 88.5%). Common causes of PPIUCD removal were social. Conclusions: Postpartum insertion of IUCD is safe effective, feasible and reversible method of contraception. [Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2(2.000): 204-208]
Other Latest Articles
- A comparative study of manual vaccum aspiration (MVA) AND electric vaccum aspiration (EVA) for pregnancy termination of upto 10 weeks gestation
- Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ormeloxifene and norethisterone in dysfunctional uterine bleeding
- A study of meconium stained amniotic fluid, its significance and early maternal and neonatal outcome
- Pain relief in labour: tramadol versus pentazocine
- Study of endometrial pathology in abnormal uterine bleeding
Last modified: 2013-05-26 10:24:44