Triphenyltin (IV) Dithiocarbamate Compounds Induce Cytotoxicity in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Jurkat E6.1) Primarily via DNA Fragmentation and Cell Cycle Arrest
Journal: Journal of Medicinal and Chemical Sciences (Vol.6, No. 10)Publication Date: 2023-10-01
Authors : Normah Awang; Noor Hanim Mohd Nor; Nurul Farahana Kamaludin; Sharifah Nadhira Syed Annuar;
Page : 2397-2406
Keywords : Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL); Triphenyltin (IV) dithiocarbamate; genotoxicity; DNA damage; cell cycle arrest;
Abstract
Introduction: A chemotherapeutic agent known as the etoposide is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Over the years, the etoposide usage in treating ALL has yielded positive outcomes. Nevertheless, it has been discovered that a number of ALL patients experience side-effects and are susceptible to cancer cells. Accordingly, drug research for improved chemotherapy becomes necessary. The results of numerous investigations using compounds containing organotin (IV) dithiocarbamate were encouraging.
Aim: The objective of this study is to examine the genotoxicity effects on Jurkat E6.1 cells, derivatives of the aforementioned substances were chosen for this investigation.
Materials and Methods: The assessment of cell cycle arrest and genotoxic effects on Jurkat E6.1 cell lines was accomplished using the substances triphenyltin (IV) diisopropyldithiocarbamate (C1) and triphenyltin (IV) dialkyldithiocarbamate (C2). The cell cycle arrest was established using cell cycle analysis. The average DNA tail moment score was used to calculate the genotoxic effects of DNA damage. Inhibitory concentration (IC50) was used to conduct both analyses. C1 has an IC50 of 0.1 M, while C2 has an IC50 of 0.2 M. On the other hand, the etoposide, which served as a positive control, has an IC50 of 0.87 M.
Results: The research findings demonstrated that after four hours of treatment, both triphenyltin (IV) dithiocarbamate and etoposide compounds prompted cell cycle arrest, with a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the S phase. Following a four-hour etoposide treatment, the findings of genotoxicity assessment revealed substantial DNA damage (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the C1 and C2 treatments revealed a similar level of DNA damage. However, when a statistical analysis of the comet assay results was accomplished, no discernible change (p > 0.05) was observed.
Conclusion: In summary, DNA damage and cell cycle trapping were caused by etoposide, C1, and C2 in Jurkat E6.1 cells.
Other Latest Articles
- The Context of Nursing Intervention of Sand Bed Culture in Reducing Osteoarthritis Pain Scale
- The Effect of Nanochitosane of Red Snapper Fish Scales (Lutjanus Sp.) on Pain and Pulp Inflammation
- Predictive Value of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Children with COVID-19
- Urinary Tract Infection Caused by the Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients before and after Ceftriaxone Restriction Policy in a Tertiary Referral Hospital
- Effect of Forest Bee Honey (Apis dorsata) Supplementation on Expression of HIF-1α, SOD, and TNF-α in Rats (Rattus norvegicus) Liver Exposed to Physical Stress
Last modified: 2023-06-18 17:42:54