Risk Reducing-Mastectomy: Experience of a University Hospital in Argentin
Journal: International Journal of Transplantation & Plastic Surgery (IJTPS) (Vol.4, No. 2)Publication Date: 2020-07-30
Authors : McLean IL Montoya D Beccar Varela E Morris B Barber J Condins C Constanza Vallone M Berdinelli D García Suarez P Schejtman D; McLean LH;
Page : 1-6
Keywords : Breast cancer; High risk; Risk reduction mastectomy;
Abstract
Background: The number of risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) has increased over the past years as genetic testing has become more readily available. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the experience of a University Hospital in Argentina Material and methods: The analysis included healthy patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral RRM and those with a history of breast cancer who underwent contralateral RRM. Patients with mastec¬tomies performed as treatment of breast cancer were not considered, but those with contralateral mastectomies were included. Results: Seventy RRM were performed in 49 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the analy¬sis. Mean age was 44 years (range: 34-64). The nipple-areola complex was preserved in 60 cases. In 50 cases, breast reconstruction was performed by direct implant placement. In 57 patients, the incision was placed radially in the upper outer quadrant. Fifty-seven patients did not present complications, and in the rest of the cases the implant was lost in only one (1.4%) case. An occult breast cancer was detected in only one patient. During follow-up, one patient developed a small carcinoma in the operated breast. Conclusion: RRM is a valid and safe option for women at high risk for breast cancer, since it signifi¬cantly reduces the probability of developing the disease, with good aesthetic results and a high level of patient satisfaction.
Other Latest Articles
- Evaluation of Delayed Pedicled TRAM Flap for Breast Reconstruction in High Risk Patients
- Book Review: Markakis, J., Schlee, G., & Young, J. (2021). The Nation State: A Wrong Model for the Horn of Africa. Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften, 184 p.
- Book Review: Salleh, A., & Idris, A. (2021). Malaysia’s United Nations Peacekeeping Operations (1960-2010). Springer, 231 p.
- Book Review: Fujishige, H. N., Uesugi, Y., & Honda, T. (2022). Japan’s Peacekeeping at a Crossroads: Taking a Robust Stance or Remaining Hesitant? Palgrave Macmillan, 264 p.
- Book Review: Charbonneau, B., & Ricard, M. (Eds.). (2022). Routledge Handbook of African Peacebuilding. Routledge, 308 p.
Last modified: 2023-07-04 19:16:11