Saving Lives by Modifying the Process of Science: Estimated Historical Mortality Associated with the Failure to Conduct Routine Prospective Cumulative Systematic Reviews |Biomedgrid
Journal: American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research (Vol.14, No. 6)Publication Date: 2021-11-22
Authors : Robert A Hahn; Teutsch SM;
Page : 531-534
Keywords : Mortalityintravenous; Vasodilators; Circumstances; Patients; Population;
Abstract
Cumulative meta-analysis, or “living systematic reviews,” can save lives. Using epidemiologic methods and findings from a classic study of interventions to reduce heart attack mortality (Antman 1992), we estimated annual deaths that may have occurred because cumulative metaanalyses were not conducted. Failure to use knowledge that would have been available with cumulative meta-analysis may have resulted in 41,000 deaths annually from non-use of intravenous dilators, 35,000 deaths annually from aspirin non-use, and 37,000 deaths annually from ß-blockers non-use. The consequences of failure to routinely conduct cumulative meta-analyses are 1) non-use of effective interventions, 2) continued use of ineffective/harmful interventions, and 3) unnecessary research.
Other Latest Articles
- Bacilliferous Tuberculosis in Children |Biomedgrid
- Intensification in Antibiotic Consumption in Pakistan and Factors that Promote the use of Antibiotics: A Mini Literature Review |Biomedgrid
- Porcine Respiratory and Reproductive Syndrome Virus (PRRSV): Infection of Piglets |Biomedgrid
- Doctors’ Opinion about Importance of Olive Leaves in Oxidative and Physical Stress |Biomedgrid
- Preservation of Alveolar Dimensions at Molar Immediate Implant Sites Using Laser-Assisted Clot Stabilization: A Report of Four Consecutive Cases with One to Three Years of Follow
Last modified: 2023-11-16 22:10:53