I HAVE ALL SORTS OF VOICES IN MY HEAD МЕДИТАЦИИ НАД КНИГОЙ ГЕОРГИЯ ЧЕРНАВИНА «ПОДОБИЕ СОВЕСТИ»
Journal: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology (Vol.12, No. 2)Publication Date: 2023-12-30
Authors : МАКСИМ МИРОШНИЧЕНКО;
Page : 596-611
Keywords : conscience; debt; guilt; paralyzing compass; symbolic institution; symbolic misadventure;
Abstract
The review analyzes the book The Conscience's Double by Georgy Chernavin. I focus on the concepts of false twins of conscience, guilt, and duty in the extended context of philosophical and artistic discourse. The problem of the difference between conscience and its ersatz forms, which give rise to a distorted ethical consciousness, is considered. The main emphasis is opportunistic conscience, neurotic guilt, and false debt. The review suggests that Chernavin's book studies the “sad theory” of moral disorientation and requires the supplementation with a hypothetical “cringe theory.” In this case, the “sad theory” makes it possible to expand the phenomenological discourse by including a discussion of conscience, illustrating the uncertainty of the boundaries between the phenomenological and the symbolic, and highlighting the subject's dependence on what they are not. In this work, there is a potential for developing an original ontology of the relationship between conscience and its evil counterpart, especially between a “spiritually sighted” and a “blindly corporeal” person. The scrutinized guilt for the lost absence of guilt is an experience that, although not lived, is important for the subject's self-constitution. This experience, like the inner side of the subject, determines its conscious functioning and forms something like a Mobius strip. An Evil Genius makes this bond, and I am trying to conceptualize their “weakened” being.
Other Latest Articles
- МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ НАУЧНЫЙ СЕМИНАР «ТРАНСЦЕНДЕНТАЛЬНЫЙ ПОВОРОТ В СОВРЕМЕННОЙ ФИЛОСОФИИ — 8»
- КОНСТИТУИРОВАНИЕ СМЫСЛА VS ОТКРЫТИЕ РЕАЛЬНОСТИ: КАК ВОЗМОЖНА ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЯ СЕГОДНЯ 2.0?
- АУДИАЛЬНЫЙ ОБРАЗ: ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ ЛОКАЛИЗАЦИЯ ПРОБЛЕМЫ
- ДОЛГ И МОРАЛЬНОЕ МИРОВОЗЗРЕНИЕ В «ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИИ ДУХА» И ФЕНОМЕНОЛОГИЧЕСКАЯ КРИТИКА DING AN SICH
- THE TRANSCENDENTAL AND THE MUNDANE SPHERES: ARE THEY REALLY ONTOLOGICALLY DISCTINCT?
Last modified: 2024-01-10 23:43:59