COMPARATIVE RADIATION DOSIMETRY OF WHOLE BREAST RADIOTHERAPY USING IMRT AND VMAT TECHNIQUES IN LEFT SIDED BREAST CANCER PATIENTS AFTER BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY

Background:The radiotherapy of left sided breast cancers is mandatory and integral part of treatment and challenging because of surrounding critical structures posing increased risk of complications. The main objective of this study was to quantify doses toorgan at risk(OARs) including left lung, heart, contralateral breast, spinal cord, and planning target volume (PTV) using different radiation techniques like Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)&volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and comparison of radiation dosimetry. Methods: A prospective study of 30 patients of left sided breast cancer who had undergone Breast Conservative Surgery (BCS) and chemotherapy was done for adjuvant radiation. For every patient radiation planning was done by two different techniques IMRT and VMAT. Then the comparison of radiation dosimetry parameters was done for all the techniques including the parameters like PTV coverage, doses to OAR like heart, left lung, contralateral breast and spinal cord and head of humerus. The Homogenity Index (HI) were calculated. Result: The Mean age of the patient was 46.7 years. When comparing the doses delivered in IMRT and VMAT Technique for left sided breast cancer post breast conservation surgery there was significant difference in PTV Breast and axilla V95 Gy. It was 96.2±1.9% (IMRT) vs 94.8±1.71% (VMAT), (p=0.004). However significant sparing of Organs at Risk was seen. With ipsilateral lung dose mean V5 Gy was 77.86± 9.68% (IMRT) v/s 83.04± 9.86 % (VMAT), (p=0.0446). Also mean V30 Gy was 14.6±4.82% with IMRT vs 16.54±5.86% with VMAT, (p=0.0169). Heart mean dose was 8.8±1.49 Gy with IMRT and 10.98±3.7 Gy with VMAT, (p=0.0227). Further V30 Gy for Heart was 4.61±3.8% with IMRT and 6.72±4.0% with VMAT, (p=0.0132).No significant difference was seen with IMRT and VMAT technique for contralateral lung, contralateral breast and spinal cord. Conclusion: In treatment of patients with radiation with left breast cancer patients post BCS using IMRT and VMAT technique it is seen significant dose reduction with IMRT Technique for ipsilateral lung and Heart as compared to VMAT technique. Significant V95 coverage for PTV Breast and axilla with IMRT as compared to VMAT. Hence in our Study IMRT technique was found to be superior for better sparing of Organ at risk and better PTV coverage.