The Beginnings of Metaphilosophy: Heinrich Struve vs. Morris Laserowitz
Journal: RUDN Journal of Philosophy (Vol.28, No. 3)Publication Date: 2024-10-08
Authors : Konstantin Skripnik;
Page : 757-770
Keywords : metaphilosophy; philosophy of philosophy; Morris Laserowitz; Heinrich Struve;
Abstract
The recognition of metaphilosophy as a separate independent philosophical discipline forces us to pay attention not only to the various variants of its understanding and its own status, but also to the history of its origin and development. It is believed that the beginning of metaphilosophy as a study of the nature of philosophy was laid by several articles by M. Lazerowitz, although some other philosophers are mentioned in passing. The study characterizes Lazerowitz’s desire to understand metaphilosophy as a view of philosophy “from the outside” and demonstrates the failure of this attempt: in fact, his metaphilosophy represents a position “inside” philosophy itself. The author of the research argues that the beginning of philosophy of philosophy should be associated with the works of the Russian and Polish philosopher Heinrich Struve and suggests a broader reconstruction of his approach. A comparison of the works of these philosophers makes it possible to identify their common starting point, which is the statement of the presence of many disagreements in philosophy, that is, what Kant called a “scandal” in philosophy. The differences between the two approaches are also revealed, in particular, Struve’s philosophy of philosophy is a precursor to any philosophy in general, aimed, while maintaining the different points of view of individual philosophers, at developing a “common worldview”. As the subject of his philosophy of philosophy, Struve calls a historical and critical analysis of the current state of philosophy, an explanation of the subject, tasks, goals, aspirations and method of philosophy; among the “principles” of philosophy is the study of the relationship of philosophy to other “phenomena of mental life.” In addition to Lazerowitz and Struve, the author points to other philosophers (for example, J. Maritain, V. Ern, E. Kalinowsky, T. Oizerman), whose interests include metaphilosophical problems, and a detailed study of their works can help to see a certain historical tradition of metaphilosophy.
Other Latest Articles
- The Refraction of Byzantine and Ancient Russian Ideas in the Ethical and Political Writings of John IV the Terrible
- Logical and Epistemological Doctrine of Leonid E. Gabrilovich on Mathematical Thinking and Actual Form
- Wolfgang Marx as a post-Neo-Kantian: The Reflection of the Reflection of the Reflection
- Transcendental Philosophy and Post-Neo-Kantianism. On the Continuity of the Problem History of Transcendental Systematics in the 20th Century
- Critique of the One Reason. On the Systemic Unity of the Three ‘Critiques’
Last modified: 2024-10-08 18:58:44