ResearchBib Share Your Research, Maximize Your Social Impacts
Sign for Notice Everyday Sign up >> Login

Evaluating the Management of Physical Education Facilities and Infrastructure in State Elementary Schools in Yogyakarta

Journal: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications (Vol.7, No. 5)

Publication Date:

Authors : ;

Page : 77-80

Keywords : Evaluation; Management; Physical Education; Sports; Health Facilities and Infrastructure.;

Source : Downloadexternal Find it from : Google Scholarexternal

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the management evaluation of Physical, Sport and Health Education facilities and infrastructure in state elementary schools in Yogyakarta, examining it from the aspects of objectives, input, activities, product, and outcomes. It also aims to determine whether the management of Physical, Sport and Health Education facilities and infrastructure in these schools has been managed well. This research is an evaluative study that applies McDavid's evaluation method. The subjects of this research were school principals from state elementary schools in Yogyakarta, with a total of 89 respondents, and a sample of 53 respondents randomly selected. Data was collected using a survey with a questionnaire instrument, which had a reliability coefficient of 0.996. Data analysis techniques included descriptive analysis for quantitative data and qualitative analysis. The results show that the evaluation of management in state elementary schools in Yogyakarta falls into the moderate category. This was demonstrated by 2 respondents (3.77%) being in the very poor category, 11 respondents (20.75%) in the poor category, 28 respondents (52.83%) in the moderate category, and 12 respondents (22.64%) in the good category, with no respondents rating it as very good (0.00%). The evaluation will be further reviewed by each aspect: (1) The objective aspect of the management of physical education and sports facilities and infrastructure in state elementary schools in Yogyakarta is still inadequate, as evidenced by 22 respondents (41.51%) rating it as moderate; (2) The input aspect is considered good, with 18 respondents (33.96%) rating it as good; (3) The activity aspect remains insufficient, with 23 respondents (43.40%) rating it as moderate; (4) The product aspect is still lacking, with 23 respondents (43.40%) rating it as moderate; and (5) The outcome aspect is also insufficient, with 23 respondents (43.40%) rating it as moderate.

Last modified: 2024-11-24 20:46:11