Comparison of hernioplasty under local anesthesia v/s spinal anesthesia
Journal: International Archives of Integrated Medicine (IAIM) (Vol.2, No. 5)Publication Date: 2015-05-14
Authors : Jignesh Jethva; Jaydeep Gadhavi; Pallav Patel; Hiren Parmar;
Page : 48-55
Keywords : Inguinal hernia; Hernioplasty; Local anesthesia; Spinal anesthesia.;
Abstract
Background: Hernia is a common surgical problem which requires good surgical skill as well as good knowledge about anatomy and various repair of hernia. Hernia is a protrusion of a viscous of part of viscous through a normal or abnormal opening in the wall of its containing cavity. Inguinal hernioplasty can be done under general anesthesia, spinal/epidural and local anesthesia. The choice of anesthesia depends upon a variety of factors viz patient's acceptance, surgeon’s wishes, safety, feasibility and cost etc. Recently there has been revival in the use of local anesthetic technique for hernioplasty. Aim: To study comparison of local anesthesia v/s spinal anesthesia for per-operative and post-operative outcome measures. Material and methods: We have done comparative study of total 100 patients (50 patients under local anesthesia and 50 patients under spinal anesthesia), with follow up period of 60 days. The present study included male patients of uncomplicated inguinal hernia with ASA grade 1 to 3. Patients were selected without bias of type (Direct/Indirect) and extent. All patients were explained about both the methods of anesthesia for hernioplasty, those who willing for local anesthesia were selected for this group and similarly spinal anesthesia group selected (Total 100, 50 in each group). Results: All patients were explained about both the methods of anesthesia for hernioplasty, those who willing for local anesthesia were selected for this group and similarly spinal anesthesia group selected (Total 100, 50 in each group). In local anesthesia group 7 (14%) patients had intra-operative discomfort in form of pain. 64% of patients of local had mild pain and 38% had moderate pain. None of the patients belonged to serve pain group. In spinal anesthesia, 6% of patient had serve pain, 22% patients had mild pain and 72% patients had moderate degree of pain. Local anesthesia was associated with less post-operative complication, in our study no patient develop complication like nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, or headache. Conclusion: hernioplasty under local anesthesia was an acceptable alternative to spinal anesthesia for hernioplasty especially with regard to operative condition, patient’s surgeon’s satisfaction, post-operative pain relief, complications and cost effectiveness.
Other Latest Articles
- MRI versus clinical examination for the diagnosis of meniscal and ligamentous injuries of knee
- Study of management of 25 cases of fistula-in-ano
- Stress levels and “immediate examination performance” of medical students
- Metformin as a safe and cost effective alternative to insulin in women with Diabetes in pregnancy
- Effect of slump stretching on pain and disability in non-radicular low back pain
Last modified: 2015-06-03 14:06:44