ResearchBib Share Your Research, Maximize Your Social Impacts
Sign for Notice Everyday Sign up >> Login

Administrative sovereignty in the age of algorithmic governance: challenges and prospects for policy autonomy of the BRICS states

Journal: RUDN Journal of Public Administration (Vol.12, No. 4)

Publication Date:

Authors : ; ;

Page : 502-508

Keywords : AI-driven governance; institutional independence; national digital autonomy; policy self-determination; developing world; technological dependency; bureaucratic autonomy; algorithmic impact on decision-making;

Source : Download Find it from : Google Scholarexternal

Abstract

Governments worldwide are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic systems to improve service delivery, manage resources, and respond to citizens’ needs. These tools promise efficiency, precision, and cost savings, making them highly attractive for policymakers. However, for particularly emerging digital powers like India and Russia - the rapid spread of algorithmic governance raises a critical dilemma: can these countries harness innovation without eroding their own administrative and policy autonomy? This study explores algorithmic governance as the integration of AI into decision-making in public administration. While such systems have the potential to modernize governance, they also pose risks to administrative sovereignty, especially when states depend heavily on foreign technologies. In developing contexts, structural weaknesses such as fragile institutions, limited domestic innovation, and reliance on global technology firms intensify this vulnerability. Drawing on theories of technological determinism, bureaucratic autonomy, and digital colonialism, the study examines India and Russia as case studies. The findings reveal opportunities for efficiency and transparency but also highlight risks of exclusion, bias, and dependency. The study argues that the tension between modernization and autonomy demands a framework for algorithmic sovereignty, which emphasizes ethical AI use, domestic technological development, and institutional safeguards to ensure that technology serves governance rather than governs it.

Last modified: 2026-01-03 17:25:08