Comparative Performance of a Non-recessed Hole-entry Hybrid/Hydrostatic Conical Journal Bearing Compensated with Capillary and Orifice Restrictors
Journal: Tribology in Industry (Vol.38, No. 2)Publication Date: 2016-06-20
Authors : P.G. Khakse; V.M. Phalle; S.S. Mantha;
Page : 133-148
Keywords : Conical; Restrictor; Hole-entry; Hybrid Capillary; Orifice; FEM;
Abstract
This research paper deals with the theoretical study of comparison of capillary and orifice compensated non-recess hole-entry hydrostatic/ hybrid conical journal bearing. Modified Reynolds equation governing the flow of lubricant in the clearance space of conical journal and bearing has been solved using FEM, Newton-Raphson method and Gauss elimination method. Spherical coordinate system has been employed to obtain the results. The results have been computed for uniform distribution of holes in the circumferential direction with the range of restrictor design parameter C ?_s2 = 0.02 - 0.1. The numerically simulated result shows, the use of orifice restrictor is to increase bearing stiffness, threshold speed and maximum pressure compared to capillary restrictor for applied radial load.
Other Latest Articles
- Self Organized Energy Efficient Algorithm for Network Creation and Maintenance in MANETs
- Envisaging the R & D Impact by correlation of R & D Personnel and Patent Output
- A NOVEL TEXTURE AND SHAPE PATTERN-BASED FEATURE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE FOR IMAGE RETRIEVAL IN MEDICAL IMAGES
- Intellectual Property Rights: In Digital Environment
- INTERNET INDEPENDENT MOBILE LOCATION TRACKING SYSTEM
Last modified: 2016-07-11 17:28:11