MAPPING CONFLICT ANARKHISTS BETWEEN THE ELECTION CANDIDATE SUPPORT REGIONAL HEAD (GENERAL ELECTION) DISTRICT IN INDONESIA AND PREVENTION THROUGH COMMUNICATIONS POLITICAL FORMULA

Election practices should be an important momentum for local people to directly elect the head of terrain. Election study conducted by the National Law Reform Consortium (KRHN) concluded, that the celebration of democracy in 2010 “to lose meaning, because of money politics and the politicization of the bureaucracy so dominate the process of winning the election.” Practice of money politics and politicization of bureaucracy has proved to be the dominant color in the election, which the local political elite to mobilize support in a manner that is not democratic, through money politics and the politicization of the bureaucracy, which can be a catalyst for the emergence of the anarchic nature of conflict that candidate's supporters. For that we need a formula that can prevent the occurrence of conflicts that are anarchists so that the election can be run with an elegant and legitimate. This study aims to: map the anarchic conflict between supporters of candidates in the election for the hereafter devised a formula that can prevent conflict anarchists in the election. This exploratory study used a qualitative approach to domain analysis by making kategoriasi on each domain, secondary data was collected through observation and primary data extracted by using interviews with key figures in the interview guide. The result made the right formula of political communication. The results showed that the dominant factor that led to the anarchic conflict in the election are: permanent voters list (DPT), the meaning of regulations on verification requirements that pose multiple interpretations, alignments Recovery Commission (KPU) area on one candidate (not neutral), and weight requirements for the candidates of the path independent (non-party). The formula that can be applied to prevent the occurrence of conflicts caused by anarchists such things is by using a model of political communication that combines the modern political media channels and traditional media to elevate the political wisdom in each local area and have a peace agreement signed by the respective each team as well as the potential bearer binding sanctions on the implementation of the election process.