COMPARITIVE EFFECT OF GONG’S MOBLISATION VERSUS MULLIGAN’S MOBILISATION ON PAIN AND SHOULDER ABDUCTION MOBILITY IN FROZEN SHOULDER

Background and introduction: The purpose is to compare the effect of gong’s mobilization versus mulligan’s mobilization on improving pain and shoulder abduction mobility for subjects with frozen shoulder. Method: 30 subjects with unilateral frozen shoulder whose abduction ROM was limited to 120 degree or less were selected and randomized 15 subjects each into Gong’s and MWM group. Gong’s group received Gong’s mobilization with conventional therapy while MWM group received movement with mobilization and conventional therapy for duration of five sessions per week for 3 weeks. A goniometer to measure sho ulder abduction ROM and VAS to measure pain were used. Results: Analysis using Independent ‘t’ test and Mann Whitney U test found that there is no statistically sig nificant difference (p