TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE REGULATION OF THE TRANSNISTRIAN CONFLICT -BETWEEN THE POLITICAL WILL AND THE JURIDICAL SOLUTIONS

In the second half of the 20th century, British pragmatism implemented a new concept in the context of solving armed conflicts, societies that clashed with dictatorships and authoritarian regimes, the ultimate goal being the national reconciliation of these societies. South Africa, Northern Ireland, Argentina, Chili, Morocco, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo etc., here are just a few examples from the list of countries that have somehow managed to implement transitional justice. The Republic of Moldova should equally be included in the list provided that there is a "frozen" conflict in its territory and the society remains divided. In this sense, we will try to make a general presentation of the correlation between the political volition and the legal solutions offered by the transitional justice