ResearchBib Share Your Research, Maximize Your Social Impacts
Sign for Notice Everyday Sign up >> Login

ANALYSIS OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INTERESTED PARTIES OF THE PROJECT

Journal: Bulletin of Prydniprovs'ka State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture (Vol.2018, No. 2)

Publication Date:

Authors : ;

Page : 81-94

Keywords : project environment; persons which interested in the project; factors that determine the success of the project; assessment of the achievement of the project objectives; opportunities to achieve the objectives of each of the stakeholders;

Source : Downloadexternal Find it from : Google Scholarexternal

Abstract

. The success or failure of the project often depends on factors which related to the environment, surrounded by the project and which are outside of the direct control of the project manager. As it known, today in the environment of Ukrainian project managers, one of the most discussed topics is models and theories related to stakeholders. It has long been known that the best results are achieved by those projects and organizations that fully take into account the influence of stakeholders and competently build their interaction with all their stakeholders, which creates value for all parties, and not just for shareholders. At the same time, classical stakeholder management mechanisms, taken from strategic management, can not be translated into project management, since the project management is more tactical in nature and requires fast, proactive actions and an equally operational management of the stakeholders. Organizations are more successful when they correlate their internal resources and capabilities with the needs of the external environment (stakeholders). At the same time, the influence of stakeholders on the outcome and success of the project is much higher than in corporate governance, since the projects are finite, the economic activity in them is more intensive. It should also be noted that the number of models for measuring the success of the project [4] is very large. However, almost all of them are concentrated only on the organization and the customer, the customer and the project team, which automatically reduces the very possibility of project success. From the authors point of view, it is more expedient to evaluate the success of the project from the point of view of various stakeholders, where the resultant indicator is the degree of their overall satisfaction. This logic of expanding the factors that determine the success of the project leads to an understanding that it is most appropriate to assess the success of the project from the perspective of all stakeholders, analyze them, balance their interests and manage them. As a result of the research, the problem of constructing a model of the impact of projects on the activities of the organization was identified. This problem can be solved with the help of a balanced system of indicators, according to any organization can be considered in different perspectives (projections), the main ones being finance, equipment, internal processes, innovations, customers and staff training. In addition, it was found that there are two main types of indicators - the resulting and motivating. The values of indicators of the first type are determined by the results of the work, and the second is the benchmark to which the organization should strive and which can affect the values of the resulting indicators. The main guideline in the field of project management is the satisfaction of all stakeholders, so the second type of indicators should be considered precisely through the prism of stakeholder management. To identify and work with motivating indicators in projects it is advisable to work with stakeholders. However, classical stakeholder management mechanisms taken from strategic management can not be translated into project management, since the project management is more tactical in nature and requires quick, active actions and an equally operational management of the stakeholders. For the analysis of stakeholders, the typology of R. Mitchell is considered.

Last modified: 2018-11-05 20:56:25