ResearchBib Share Your Research, Maximize Your Social Impacts
Sign for Notice Everyday Sign up >> Login

Defenestration

Journal: Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology (Vol.9, No. 2)

Publication Date:

Authors : ; ; ; ;

Page : 760-781

Keywords : Marc Richir; Edmund Husserl; Martin Heidegger; Maurice Merleau-Ponty; detranscendentalisation; subjectivity; phenomenalisation; distortion; truth;

Source : Downloadexternal Find it from : Google Scholarexternal

Abstract

The article « La Défenestration » by Belgian philosopher Marc Richir has been translated into Russian for the first time for this issue of the “Horizon. Studies in Phenomenology.” In his early work “The Defenestration” Richir raises the question of relation between the subject and conceivable world. Here, a philosopher is pictured contemplating the world through the window of his tower. In such detachment from the world the thinker finds himself according to all Modern philosophies of consciousness. Husserl's phenomenology inherits this detachment, since Husserl imposes the structure of transcendental ego as external to the world. Richir abolishes the concept of transcendental ego with the help of heideggerian Dasein, but analyzing Heidegger's ontology he comes to the conclusion that the latter remains fixated on beings. Believing a person to live in the fundamental openness of Being, Heidegger places such a person in the secondary world of “truth.” In order to overcome the remains of traditional philosophy in Heidegger's ontology Richir turns to Merleau-Ponty' “cosmology of the visible.” The author takes the Merleau-Ponty's thesis that everything visible has something fundamentally invisible in it. This allows him to discover the universe of “nothing” (rien), which includes both the visible and what is “behind” it. As a result Richir overcomes the classical dualism of the sensual and the intelligible. The concept of defenestration places the subject and the world in the same universe.

Last modified: 2021-01-14 01:23:12