Appraisal of Staff Perception toward Restored Endodontic Treated Teeth at Selected Dental Clinics, Saudi Arabia

Today, periodontal disease, trauma, and congenital defects can result in both soft tissue and hard tissue defects that can present with aesthetic problems. The management of these problems may be limited to prevention or surgical management which can result in significant morbidity especially if a second surgical site for grafting is utilized. There are a variety of techniques and materials that allow the clinician to manage the Restored Endodontically Treated Teeth in Relation to Periodontal Status during restoration and when making an impression. These include gingival retraction cords, chemical reagents, electro surgery, laser tissue sculpting, copper tube impressions, hydraulic impressions, and non-invasive, a traumatic displacement/haemostatic materials. In most cases gingival retraction cord is the most effective method for retracting tissue to the depth of the sulcus. Furthermore, the other methods have their advantages and indications. In any case, the control of the soft tissue for exposing the margins of the tooth preparation for restoration and impressioning is critical. It would be worthwhile for the clinician to understand all the choices available. The aim of this study was to assess the staff perspective toward Endodontically Treated Teeth in Relation to at Selected Dental Clinics. Looking forwards prevention strategies for improving the management outcome.