ResearchBib Share Your Research, Maximize Your Social Impacts
Sign for Notice Everyday Sign up >> Login

“THEY DON’T KNOW THAT THEY DON’T KNOW”: REVEALING AND QUANTIFYING THE SOCRATES BIAS

Journal: International Education and Research Journal (Vol.3, No. 6)

Publication Date:

Authors : ;

Page : 333-337

Keywords : Socrates bias; medical education; self-assessment; questionnaire; bias;

Source : Downloadexternal Find it from : Google Scholarexternal

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine whether bias (over- or under-estimation of self-competence) affects pre-training ratings and hence distorts the actual participation effect of experiential workshops. Assessments were held during “empathy in doctor-patient relationship” elective courses held during winter 2014, spring 2015 and winter 2016 at Ioannina's Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece. Twenty-eight women and 19 men aged 21-28 years (mean = 22.8, SD = 1.52), in 4th (n = 18), 5th (n = 19) and 6th (n=10) year of medical studies took part, voluntarily, in the empathy training. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy was used on a total of 47 medical undergraduates to measure empathic performance both before (B) and a-posteriori-before (P) training. Overestimation of empathic ability was calculated as the difference B-P, and its significance was checked through paired t-test, while effect size (Cohen's d) was used to reveal any practical importance. Participants' mean B score (+SD) was 110.6 (10.5) whereas P was 88.6 (13.8; p(B-P) < 0.001). Assuming total P as the basis (100), total B was 124.8, i.e 24.8% overestimation. A very large effect size was found (d = 1.81) for B-P indicating a highly practical importance. There were no significant differences between the 3 cohorts nor between men &women.

Last modified: 2022-04-22 22:19:29