Building A System of Accountable Law Enforcement and Dignity In Indonesia

Law is born from a social dimension that aims to create order, security and social justice for all people. To formulate a law that is sourced from the values of the Indonesian people is how to create a responsive law that is able to implement the wishes of the Indonesian people. Whereas the other main pillar in forming a responsive law is how to form a good and comprehensive understanding of law enforcement officers in understanding and implementing rules based on the principles of human values that live and develop in society, not just being "puppets of the law". Responsive law is in line with the values embodied in the soul of the Indonesian nation, namely Pancasila, which is a reflection of human values and values of justice. Law Number 19 of 1964 concerning the Basic Provisions of Judicial Power which in Article 19 stipulates that the President may participate or interfere in the interests of the Revolution, the State and State Honor, or the interests of the people which are very urgent. Thus, the law is certainly very unlikely that the norms of an independent judiciary in the explanation of the 1945 Constitution are not translated into the words of the practice of the New Order Doctrine which is consistently and consistently implemented in Law Number 19 of 1964. This is clear for. The independence of the judiciary is highly dependent on the system and the prevailing political style of power. Implementing accountability will further increase public trust. The accountability of the judiciary is highly dependent on the accountability of judges. The judge's decision must be legally understood. Judges make decisions based solely on evidence in court, taking into account law enforcement and the realization of justice. The first responsible decision can only be taken by a judge who does not have a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest that threatens the accountability of a decision is the corruption of the judiciary. For example, judges involved in bribery cannot make decisions freely and responsibly.