Morphological features of various variants of the course of scleroatrophic lichen of the vulva

Relevance. Most of the scientific papers presented in the literature indicate morphological features of the stages of development of sclerotic lichen of the vulva, or in comparison with other vulvar skin lesions. At the same time, data on the features of morphological examination of vulvar biopsies, depending on the clinical variants of the course of sclerotic lichen of the vulva, is currently insufficient. The aim of the study - to determine the presence or absence of distinctive morphological features of the sclerotic lichen of the vulva, depending on the clinical variants of its course. Materials and Methods. The study included 292 patients with sclerotic lichen of the vulva (20-70 years old). Based on the scale of assessment of objective and subjective clinical signs of sclerotic lichen of the vulva developed by us, 3 clinical groups: 101 patients with an atrophic variant of the course, 154 with a sclerosing variant and 37 patients with a scleroatrophic variant of the course of sclerotic lichen of the vulva. In addition to clinical laboratory, instrumental and immunological studies, all patients underwent incisional biopsy of the vulva followed by morphological examination of biopsies. Results and Discussion. The features of the results of morphological examination of various clinical variants of the course of sclerotic lichen of the vulva are described and presented in the form of images. The characteristic morphological signs for each clinical group, as well as common signs characteristic of all variants of the course of this pathology, were revealed. Morphological examination of vulvar tissues is informative only to confirm the diagnosis of «Sclerotic lichen of the vulva», to determine the stage of the disease, as well as to exclude the malignant process, while for a clear differentiation of variants of the clinical course of sclerotic lichen of the vulva, conventional morphological examination is not enough, which requires further studies using immunohistochemical and molecular genetic methods. Conclusion. The revealed differences in morphological parameters of various variants of the course of sclerotic lichen of the vulva are insufficiently specific, which excludes the possibility of accurate morphological verification of the variants of the course of sclerotic lichen of the vulva and confirms the expediency of using clinical classification of variants of the course of sclerotic lichen of the vulva based on objective and subjective clinical signs.