TRUENESS AND PRECISION OF DIFFERENT DIGITAL SCAN SYSTEMS IN A TWO IMPLANT COMPLETE ARCH MODEL: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

Background: One of the major concerns in implant-retained prostheses is their accuracy which plays an essential role in implant success and prosthesis adaptation. Although many contemplates stated the indications and merits of different digital scanner systems, little is identified about their trueness and precision in scanning dental implants of implant-retained prostheses. Objectives: This contemplate aimed to evaluate and compare the trueness and precision of two unalike most recent digital scan systems in a mandibular two-implant complete arch model. Materials and Methods: A completely edentulous mandibular cast was utilized into which two conventional dental implant analogs were drilled in its inter-foramina area from which the distance between the analogs was measured by a caliper (Control). The same space was assessed via scanning the whole assembly 13 scans/each digital scanner system. The final distance of each scan attained from both systems was then compared with the control. The accuracy of each system was assessed in terms of trueness and precision. Results: Slight advancement of the Dof Freedom X5 premium digital scanner system than the Medit T300-T500 dental digital scanner regarding trueness although they were still insignificantly different, as P=0.66. The Medit digital scanner system was significantly better than the Dof Freedom one concerning precision, as P=0.001. Conclusion: The two dental laboratory digital scanner systems employed are reliable tools for scanning and reproducing digital dental records accurately for an implant-supported prosthesis. Furthermore, the Medit dental digital scanner system seemed to be more accurate in terms of precision than the Dof Freedom one.