THE UTILITY OF A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE TWO BANKS OF THE DNIESTR. SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

When the consequences of this secession are analysed, the overwhelming majority of the experts prefer the geopolitical paradigm. How much are the development politics influenced beyond the security problem? Aren`t the chances of development, regarding investing finances and other types of energies in security, affected? Did the Tiraspol regime succeed to offer more wealth to the population from the date of assuming the administrative authority? How much of the local wealth is funded by the local work and how much of it depends on external help (which can be conjunctural)? Is the development of the Western area of the Dniestr River affected by the secession of the east? Which are the implemented politics and which are the desired response politics?